Leasing Vs. Buying Equipment: What's Your Preferred Approach?

Leasing Vs. Buying Equipment: What’s Your Preferred Approach?

Leasing Vs. Buying Equipment: What’s Your Preferred Approach?

In the debate of leasing versus buying equipment, we’ve gathered insights from CEOs to roofing experts, distilling their experiences into five key perspectives. From buying for long-term savings to considering project frequency when deciding, these professionals shed light on the benefits of each option. Discover why blending leasing and buying might offer the flexibility your organization needs, and how leasing can provide agility in fast-paced markets.

  • Buy Equipment for Long-Term Savings
  • Blend Leasing and Buying for Flexibility
  • Lease for Financial Strategy and Tech Updates
  • Leasing Offers Agility in Fast-Paced Markets
  • Lease or Buy Based on Project Frequency

Buy Equipment for Long-Term Savings

In the early years of our company, we faced a critical decision regarding our IT infrastructure. We decided to buy the necessary equipment outright rather than leasing it.

Owning our equipment allowed us to customize and upgrade without restrictions. This flexibility was crucial as we expanded our services. The initial investment was significant, but it saved us money in the long run. We avoided the recurring costs and potential interest associated with leasing. Additionally, owning the equipment improved our balance sheet, which proved beneficial when seeking financing for other business initiatives.

For organizations considering leasing versus buying, evaluate your long-term needs and financial situation. Purchasing can offer more control and cost savings if you have the capital. However, leasing might be advantageous if you need to stay updated with the latest technology without large upfront expenses. Assess your goals and choose the best option that aligns with your growth strategy.

Konrad MartinKonrad Martin
CEO, Tech Advisors


Blend Leasing and Buying for Flexibility

We’ve ultimately settled on a blend of these two. We’re in the moving business, and moving trucks are our single biggest capital expense. Especially in markets where we’re well-established and can count on solid year-round business, owning our trucks gives us more control over our costs. We decide when to tackle maintenance, we can negotiate for good prices on fuel and other essential materials, and we know we’ll always have access to what we need. In newer markets where our success is less certain, leasing trucks gives us the flexibility to scale back our operation or change our mix of vehicles if market conditions change. In most markets, we use a core fleet of trucks we own and supplement with leased and rented vehicles as needed.

Nick ValentinoNick Valentino
VP of Market Operations, Bellhop


Lease for Financial Strategy and Tech Updates

For Dundas Life, leasing often aligns better with our financial strategy, particularly with rapidly evolving tech. A prime example was leasing high-end computing equipment. This choice allowed us flexibility to upgrade continually, ensuring our team always had the latest tools without a hefty upfront cost. It was especially beneficial as it kept capital expenditure low while maintaining operational efficiency, crucial for staying competitive in the fast-paced digital landscape of insurance brokerage.

Gregory RozdebaGregory Rozdeba
CEO, Dundas Life


Leasing Offers Agility in Fast-Paced Markets

In my line of work, I’ve found leasing equipment to be particularly beneficial for keeping up with technological advancements without a hefty upfront investment. Leasing allows for easier upgrades to the latest technology, ensuring that we stay competitive. For instance, choosing to lease high-end trading servers from TradingFXVPS enabled us to access cutting-edge technology and support without tying up significant capital. This flexibility has been crucial during periods of rapid growth, ensuring we could scale our operations efficiently. While buying equipment has its merits, particularly for long-term cost savings and asset ownership, leasing has provided us with agility and adaptability, which are essential in the fast-paced forex trading environment. My advice would be to evaluate your organization’s financial health, growth projections, and technological demands when making this decision.

Ace ZhuoAce Zhuo
Business Development Director (Sales and Marketing), Tech & Finance Expert, TradingFXVPS


Lease or Buy Based on Project Frequency

As the owner of White Oaks Construction, I generally prefer leasing equipment unless we plan on needing it frequently over the next three years. Leasing offers several advantages, such as eliminating the need for storage, upkeep, and maintenance, which can be significant burdens when owning equipment. This approach allows us to focus more on our core operations without the added responsibilities that come with ownership.

For example, when we took on a large commercial roofing project, we chose to lease a high-capacity lift. Since we didn’t anticipate needing the lift regularly after the project, leasing made more sense financially and logistically. It allowed us to access the necessary equipment without the hassle of long-term storage and maintenance, ultimately saving us time and resources.

However, if we foresee frequent use of a particular piece of equipment over the next few years, buying might be the better option. This is because the cumulative cost of leasing can surpass the purchase price over time. By carefully assessing our project pipeline and equipment needs, we can make informed decisions that balance cost-efficiency with operational convenience.

Tyler PooleTyler Poole
Roofing Expert, White Oaks Construction


Submit Your Answer

Would you like to submit an alternate answer to the question, “Do you have a preference between leasing and buying equipment for your organization? Could you share an instance where your choice of leasing or buying was particularly beneficial?”

Submit your answer here.

Related Articles